![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfNco5ZJu4Tk1SlZtjF6CPtRxmxZIf2VX0vfMPxBUMuFLJzybLS2MTJORpvmernUFGsrFA16zpR3XrPBpxYMRD8Qnpot4BgVxCUlmy92krof_HaTmgF-4X6lCAV3-PWW_cojT-FSeRKXRx/s1600/image0.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi14RAID-8U-DE4uA3KoL4Cq1o7hDbw8zdNzUNSxERjbBgORpBbSdh_DhQnF-yd9fTck_DAbRYCDVgSClDI999HSeAXp4hJx2gqLcM9qCQAfHTfX_IVWaPA2UjGuOCKK1sVVhz3vDiu4xFC/s1600/image1.jpg)
Double click for larger image or print out
Lavonne Beckford v. Target Corp
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhyphenhyphenCDddlkb9mQJPsNQ_TUA_Szdl2O-h6bVrNYbuWGF2WLpKuvPbDEhy-0bym1Joxe2G_nnBtL7xWo3ttSl_RnkbcEedEgtQS9sJQ5IDQRTRA6auMUbpPDnJeP1X1un86dtO1X5IfxDhmP0/s1600/image0.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXQKxU3DdR1F4XAnP6FTUmKsv-wTGyeIoz5206kmqB4_GQqU2nT1f3oL8sshiF5FLLtbu53Kc-H_af1yl1V20hyhRJRRwe29jt61bJHc954UXmwq43wtBUPfrNQKr9lkgIXPnWuSHU0bIC/s1600/image1.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghj5GWB4xdR66Y0GpldjgmKJjbzJHEyNbHNqEl01-YD91a3DNpS2rQhNYr2iaOHEzwEXQXOlYV8GGN4A_aWQdO6zXFx1sWorR4CNDWJ9lW6yIZDASUh7cg3qOGT9aYxWg89TrNOP_gMKIw/s1600/image2.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUvVSQjduufMb3xFulni3iVTGvDI1jFOyz6lfstjw2MwaPUj2yh0FKfruyvgk34jLn8TRehl0MQPb8M2nUvpjgIBQTZPirDuFLboZVPhYZRG7gAr1rgok8gtnyanLT5kASqY8EjamAibj8/s1600/image3.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpgfPLkTKcRJNSrq7sBTueMjSCEnGCuFyvtJT83a2lxUoqL1TiZuTZGLgISAyPJuZ_xXGiO3O93L0W0Iyw_ROxkNwIyvbCST9K9HhvtG-hMMfzzGKoAMiC-uT2vyMT_8OLnZ46DbIdCcVc/s1600/image4.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeU9n-4p_6L2yNjN_LeerrtJYbR6DDUC3cLIEiCnTQGeqEkz_nGLv7uwL5k5giPnec3vmiJSdonLtrJ-MWi6bafmpwN_f0vlWc4YefVIas68v5KSStK7kOCs43_RaKlAVZprdS6kNiNRzx/s1600/image5.jpg)
Target's Answer to Complaint
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhck84xbIB4fCJlJ2iuUUrLz8Px_e4IuC9sQJoLichn25D4a_trinVt387RWMJptHS7zr2UmgvNo137-Ut2d6DLrKTj667LYByHvBJxW2SJmR3vclXBtAgz4sEkMkFMk1KcJ7jXMKdWl-ML/s1600/image0-1.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZC1nX3-OcFgsnXQjY-SRhak_Pwjc5_mLW2nWwWaRKiI1OhZ0NYZ3J_Qr6gK8NGr4P8dCurb127Tyhxd9lazsbJRB5SGczgcO1DO1l2XTIwpSHOiA1Mkya36kV-iQnXE7RdCfk5EcUv18z/s1600/image2.jpg)
An Arizona case that started out in a local court and was transferred to Federal Court. A former manager said: "It was understood that I could hire someone 10 years younger than these people, at half the pay, and they had college degrees. I'd sit during the management meetings, and we'd identify who is a 'blocker'—which meant they needed to leave the company . . . "We were told to figure out how to get rid of these blockers that cost too much money,"